You can avoid two calls to the bookmaker and lock in the current line on a later game by telling your bookmaker you intend to make an “if” bet. “If” bets can be made on two games kicking off at the same time. The bookmaker will wait before first game is over. If the first game wins, he’ll put the same amount on the 2nd game even though it was already played.

Although an “if” bet is really two straight bets at normal vig, you can’t decide later that so long as want the 2nd bet. When you make an “if” bet, the 2nd bet cannot be cancelled, even when the 2nd game hasn’t gone off yet. If the first game wins, you will have action on the 2nd game. For that reason, there is less control over an “if” bet than over two straight bets. When the two games you bet overlap over time, however, the only method to bet one only if another wins is by placing an “if” bet. Of course, when two games overlap over time, cancellation of the 2nd game bet is not an issue. It should be noted, that after the two games start at different times, most books will not enable you to complete the 2nd game later. You have to designate both teams whenever you make the bet.

You may make an “if” bet by saying to the bookmaker, “I wish to make an ‘if’ bet,” and then, “Give me Team A IF Team B for $100.” Giving your bookmaker that instruction would be the just like betting $110 to win $100 on Team A, and then, only if Team A wins, betting another $110 to win $100 on Team B.

If the first team in the “if” bet loses, there is no bet on the 2nd team. No matter whether the 2nd team wins of loses, your total loss on the “if” bet will be $110 whenever you lose on the first team. If the first team wins, however, you would have a bet of $110 to win $100 going on the 2nd team. Because case, if the 2nd team loses, your total loss will be just the $10 of vig on the split of the two teams. If both games win, you would win $100 on Team A and $100 on Team B, for a total win of $200. Thus, the maximum loss on an “if” will be $110, and the maximum win will be $200. That is balanced by the disadvantage of losing the total $110, rather than just $10 of vig, each time the teams split with the first team in the bet losing.

Bettors soon found that the best way to avoid the uncertainty caused by the order of wins and loses is to create two “if” bets putting each team first. As opposed to betting $110 on ” Team A if Team B,” you would bet just $55 on ” Team A if Team B.” and then create a second “if” bet reversing the order of the teams for another $55. The next bet would put Team B first and Team A second. This sort of double bet, reversing the order of the same two teams, is known as an “if/reverse” or sometimes merely a “reverse.”

If both teams win, the effect would be the same as you played a single “if” bet for $100. You win $50 on Team A in the first “if bet, and then $50 on Team B, for a total win of $100. In the 2nd “if” bet, you win $50 on Team B, and then $50 on Team A, for a total win of $100. The 2 “if” bets together create a total win of $200 when both teams win.

If both teams lose, the effect would also be the same as in the event that you played a single “if” bet for $100. Team A’s loss would set you back $55 in the first “if” combination, and nothing would go onto Team B. In the 2nd combination, Team B’s loss would set you back $55 and nothing would go onto to Team A. You would lose $55 on all the bets for a total maximum lack of $110 whenever both teams lose.

The difference occurs once the teams split. As opposed to losing $110 when the first team loses and the 2nd wins, and $10 when the first team wins but the 2nd loses, in the reverse you’ll lose $60 on a divided whichever team wins and which loses. It computes this way. If Team A loses you’ll lose $55 on the first combination, and have nothing going on the winning Team B. In the 2nd combination, you’ll win $50 on Team B, and have action on Team A for a $55 loss, causing a net loss on the 2nd mix of $5 vig. The loss of $55 on the first “if” bet and $5 on the 2nd “if” bet provides you with a mixed lack of $60 on the “reverse.” When Team B loses, you’ll lose the $5 vig on the first combination and the $55 on the 2nd combination for the same $60 on the split..

We have accomplished this smaller lack of $60 as opposed to $110 when the first team loses without any decline in the win when both teams win. In both the single $110 “if” bet and the two reversed “if” bets for $55, the win is $200 when both teams cover the spread. The bookmakers would not put themselves at that type of disadvantage, however. The gain of $50 whenever Team A loses is fully offset by the extra $50 loss ($60 as opposed to $10) whenever Team B could be the loser. Thus, the “reverse” doesn’t actually save us anything, but it comes with the benefit of making the risk more predictable, and preventing the worry concerning which team to put first in the “if” bet.

DON’T, if you’re able to win a lot more than 52.5% or maybe more of your games. If you fail to consistently achieve a profitable percentage, however, making “if” bets once you bet two teams will save you money.

For the winning bettor, the “if” bet adds some luck to your betting equation that doesn’t belong there. If two games are worth betting, then they will both be bet. Betting on one should not be made dependent on whether or not you win another. แทงมวยวันนี้ On the other hand, for the bettor who features a negative expectation, the “if” bet will prevent him from betting on the 2nd team whenever the first team loses. By preventing some bets, the “if” bet saves the negative expectation bettor some vig.

The $10 savings for the “if” bettor results from the fact that he is not betting the 2nd game when both lose. Compared to the straight bettor, the “if” bettor has an additional cost of $100 when Team A loses and Team B wins, but he saves $110 when Team A and Team B both lose.

The rule for the winning bettor is precisely opposite. Whatever keeps the winning bettor from betting more games is bad, and therefore “if” bets will definitely cost the winning handicapper money. Once the winning bettor plays fewer games, he’s fewer winners. Understand that the very next time someone informs you that the best way to win is always to bet fewer games. An intelligent winner never wants to bet fewer games. Since “if/reverses” work-out exactly the same as “if” bets, they both place the winner at the same disadvantage.

Exceptions to the Rule – Each time a Winner Should Bet Parlays and “IF’s”
Just like all rules, there are exceptions. “If” bets and parlays should be produced by a success with an optimistic expectation in just two circumstances::

If you have no other choice and she must bet either an “if/reverse,” a parlay, or an intro; or
When betting co-dependent propositions.
The only time I will think of that you have no other choice is if you should be the very best man at your friend’s wedding, you’re waiting to walk down the aisle, your laptop looked ridiculous in the pocket of your tux which means you left it in the automobile, you simply bet offshore in a deposit account without any credit line, the book features a $50 minimum phone bet, you like two games which overlap over time, you take out your trusty cell 5 minutes before kickoff and 45 seconds before you need to walk to the alter with some beastly bride’s maid in a frilly purple dress on your arm, you try to create two $55 bets and suddenly realize you simply have $75 in your account.

Whilst the old philosopher used to express, “Is that what’s troubling you, bucky?” In that case, hold your face up high, put a smile on see your face, search for the silver lining, and create a $50 “if” bet on your two teams. Of course you can bet a parlay, but as you will dsicover below, the “if/reverse” is an excellent replacement for the parlay if you should be winner.

For the winner, the very best method is straight betting. In the event of co-dependent bets, however, as already discussed, there is a massive advantage to betting combinations. With a parlay, the bettor gets the advantage of increased parlay odds of 13-5 on combined bets which have greater compared to the normal expectation of winning. Since, by definition, co-dependent bets must often be contained within the same game, they have to be made as “if” bets. With a co-dependent bet our advantage comes from the fact that we make the 2nd bet only IF one of many propositions wins.

It’d do us no good to straight bet $110 each on the favorite and the underdog and $110 each on the over and the under. We’d simply lose the vig irrespective of how the favorite and over or the underdog and under combinations won. As we’ve seen, when we play two out of 4 possible results in two parlays of the favorite and over and the underdog and under, we could net a $160 win when among our combinations comes in. When to choose the parlay or the “reverse” when creating co-dependent combinations is discussed below.

Choosing Between “IF” Bets and Parlays
Predicated on a $110 parlay, which we’ll use for the objective of consistent comparisons, our net parlay win when among our combinations hits is $176 (the $286 win on the winning parlay minus the $110 loss on the losing parlay). In a $110 “reverse” bet our net win will be $180 each time among our combinations hits (the $400 win on the winning if/reverse minus the $220 loss on the losing if/reverse).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *