Hair is this emotive subject and with human nature being human nature, what we would like we can’t have and what we’ve we don’t want! Wild hair and we would like straight, straight hair and we would like curly, brunette and we would like blonde, blonde and we would like red. Likewise upper lip hair on a female, so valued as a sign of exquisite beauty in certain parts of the world, is vilified by our Western society.
Unwanted hair is just a common problem affecting nearly all women to varying degrees throughout their lives and prompting the usage of various temporary ways of hair reduction or hair management systems. It causes great distress, and it is often associated with feelings of poor self esteem, an expression of isolation and low self worth.
Since the instances when bearded feamales in Victorian travelling fairs were displayed for entertainment and ridicule, Western society has nurtured a stigma about excess hair. Many women are pressured into tremendous lengths to get rid of any trace of hair from any and all of these body as they think it to be unattractive and unappealing. However it is not just women which are now affected… increasingly the male gender is susceptible to pressure from the ‘fashion’ and celebrity world and unwanted hair may be just like vilified by the male population nowadays as the female.
Different Methods of Hair Removal
Superfluous hair growth may be brought on by many factors, such as for instance, hormone imbalance, (during puberty, pregnancy and menopause), genetics and ethnicity, hereditary, medication or topical stimulation e.g. waxing or tweezing. Therefore, electrolysis – the sole permanent method of hair removal, is a treatment that’s in great demand by female and transsexual clients and more recently, due to society’s attitudes, the amount of male clients is increasing.
To generally meet this need there as always been many hair removal measures some of which go back centuries in history. Hair removal has existed since caveman times but interestingly the parts of your body we’re removing hair from have differed over the ages. Removing hair from the head and face of men was originally not for vanity purposes but also for survival. There’s evidence that cavemen did this but additionally the ancient Egyptians and it had been undertaken, we imagine, for protection, as scraping off the beard and hair on the head would eliminate the benefit of an adversary having anything to grab onto along with having less mites!
In ancient Egypt, Greece, and Middle Eastern countries, removing body hair was important. In reality these women removed most of these body hair, aside from eyebrows. Egyptian women removed their head hair and pubic hair was considered uncivilized by both sexes! It absolutely was also considered uncivilized for men to possess hair on the face. Undesired facial hair was the mark of a slave or servant, or of a person of lower class. The ancient Egyptians used a questionnaire of razors made of flint or bronze as the razor was not invented till the 1760’s by French barber, Jean Jacques Perret.
In addition they used a technique of temporary hair removal called sugaring. A sticky paste (bees wax was sometimes used) will be put on your skin, a strip of cloth was pressed onto the wax and yanked off – very same of waxing today. Wealthy women of the Roman Empire would remove their body hair with pumice stones, razors, tweezing and pastes. There is also another technique used called threading which can be recently seeing a resurgence in popularity. Thin string or yarn will be placed through the fingers of your hands, and quickly stroked over the area. This repetitive process captured the hair and effectively tweezed, ripped or pulled the unwanted hair out. Throughout the Elizabethan times the practice of hair removal, (not of leg, armpit or pubic hair), of these eyebrows and the hair from their foreheads in order to give the looks of an extended brow and forehead was fashionable. It is startling to notice the obvious influence ‘fashion’ has played in hair removal from the very beginning.
Waxing, sugaring, depilatory creams, bleaching, shaving, sugaring, plucking, threading and even battery-powered tweezers multiple-plucking systems, are temporary methods that numerous people try today. In reality new hair removal devices seem to seem like buses – every 20 minutes approximately! However, technology has moved on and with it, it appears there are some restricted and doubtful ways of hair removal. X-ray and photodynamic methods come in a restricted category because the former has been banned in some countries just like the USA and the latter are only in experimental stages. Electric tweezers, transdermal electrolysis, and microwaves are some of the doubtful methods in that there is no established data on the effectiveness.
Electrolysis remains the sole proven permanent method of hair removal and many women and indeed many men, have benefited from this tried and trusted treatment. It is usually the case that electrologists are privileged to witness a remarkable transformation in their clients, from a shy, introverted personality at the start of a program of treatments, to a confident and happy individual once treatment is underway and results become apparent.
Whatever your opinion of hair, ‘removing it’ inside our Western society is a variable million pound industry. This type of huge money making machine though will have a lot more than its great amount of misconceptions, misunderstandings, myths and legends none of which relate much to the hard reality truth. The huge profit led hair removal industry has its great amount of charlatans and scams all attracted by the huge profit led opportunities.
Hair Removal methods are both permanent and temporary. The English dictionary definition of ‘permanent’ states: perpetual, everlasting. With this specific at heart there is just one system available on the market today that could totally prove ‘permanent’ hair removal primarily because longevity, client testimony and satisfaction and that’s electrolysis. Invented in 1875 electrolysis offers permanent removal of hair for many hair types and colours and all skin types and colours. It remains utilised in hospitals by surgeons and ophthalmologists for trichaisis and other distortions of the eyelashes as well supporting the hospital laser hair removal departments. It can also be considered an essential tool in the task of veterinary surgeons for animals (primarily horses and dogs) for the permanent removal of distorted and in-growing eyelashes. It gives cosmetic relief for the consumer with mild hirsute problems to the in-patient with seriously hirsute problems and for the transgender patient who may require much time of treatment.
Apparently there has been confusing messages coming from the regulatory bodies on definitions of what the words ‘permanent’, ‘removal’ or ‘reduction’ in the hair removal industry actually mean. Agreement was reached when the hairs which have been removed don’t grow back for a period of twelve months after the past treatment, permanent reduction may be claimed. Electrolysis, invented in 1875 remains even today, usually the one method legally permitted to claim ‘permanent removal’ ;.
The newer technologies such as for instance LASER (Light Amplification Stimulated Emission of Radiation) and IPL (Intense Pulse Light) were initially launched as competitors of electrolysis and initially marketed as THE answer for many permanent hair removal. This, it is now realised, is at best, somewhat nave and at worst, certainly misleading. The stark reality is that this was wishful thinking and nowadays ‘claims’ are far more realistic. The fact remains that whilst they’ve their successes they also have their limitations – they can not treat all hair colours and types and all skin colours successfully and they now accept their limitations and embrace electrolysis and electrologists as their back up.
Laser and IPL are allowed by the FDA to claim permanent ‘reduction’ but not permanent ‘removal’ of hair. The fact remains this newer technology is brilliant for big areas and for dark hair. For grey or white hair it just simply doesn’t work. Laser and IPL target the melanin in the hair and if the hair is grey or white there is no melanin remaining in the hair because of it to target. In addition to this, for unknown reason(s) not every one of the hair reacts to treatment and results vary from 85% – 95% success. The remaining 5% – 15% hair is likely to be stripped of its melanin (thus appearing white) but nevertheless stubbornly continues to grow. This then leaves the sole option of ‘permanent hair removal’ right down to additional electrolysis treatment to complete the job. Laser and IPL are now recognised to be a hair ‘management’ system and clients are advised that regrowth may occur.
Photoepilator light energy was launched in 1969 and was developed from research into laser hair removal. Photoepilators work with a burst of filtered light targeted at one hair at a time. After the focus of the light, the hair is tweezed. Like any laser and light instrument, the light used in the unit is targeted against the blood and melanin pigments in the hair and heats them up. To enable this method, fibre-optic probes were inserted into the hair follicle through that the light was flashed. There’s no clinical data published to date to support any permanency claims and there is no established data on its effectiveness.
The tweezer method having its unsubstantiated claim of ‘permanent hair removal’ was first patented in 1959. This technique works by passing an household current through the tweezers, which holds the hair on top of your skin by grasping them for a number of minutes. Electricity enters through the hair to its root and claims to permanently damage it. The scientific community has reservations as the claim of electricity destroying the basis of the hair has no scientific backup.
Transcutaneous and Transdermal offers ‘permanent Hair Removal’ but no clinical data has been published to date to determine the claim that permanent hair removal is possible using these methods. In 1985 when the usage of AC electric tweezers was stopped, the manufacturers made some modifications in the apparatus. Adhesive patches as opposed to cotton swabs were introduced and a title change into transcutaneous hair removal. It uses the notion of direct current (DC) for transdermal delivery of drugs (iontophoresis) without the usage of a needle. A DC household current is passed via a conductive gel on top of your skin via an adhesive patch added to the skin. The hair root is claimed to be damaged permanently by the household current that travels right down to the hair follicle.
To date no clinical data can be obtained and the laws of physics don’t support the claims produced by the manufacturers. 脫毛邊間好 Hair does not conduct electricity but skin does. As electricity passes through the medium of poor resistance, it will spread along the surface of your skin as opposed to passing through the hair. Therefore, just like the tweezer method, the argument so it will reach the basis of the hair to destroy it has no scientific backup.
Ultrasound hair removal claims that ultrasound waves are channelled precisely down the hair shaft and in the process they transform to thermal energy that super heats the hair growth areas and inhibits regrowth. It is stated that the waves are bound to the hair shaft and don’t dissipate into your skin prevents any side effects.
Ultrasound hair removal offers ‘total hair removal’ and claims to function as the ‘next generation of long haul hair removal devices’ ;.It states in its marketing material that it’s ‘The hair removal solution’ and that ‘no additional hair appears in exactly the same follicle proving that this is a long-term treatment’ ;.The FDA hasn’t given the outcome to date regarding a software to advertise in April 2010 of the newest device.